StrictCite
Start auditing free ↗
The scholarly record, cross-examined

Your references
should survive
scrutiny.

StrictCite asks 13 scholarly registries what they actually hold, isolates every disagreement, and gives you the evidence to make the final call.

30 references free daily·13 registries·Processed locally

Bring your bibliographyPDFBibTeXRIS
Figure 1. A bibliography audit in the real Workspace.
Start auditing free ↗
Your manuscript stays local. The engine returns evidence. You decide. Read how it works ↗

Every reference is asked of thirteen registries.

No single catalogue is complete. StrictCite compares what each source actually returns before it raises a disagreement.

What each one covers ↗
  • Crossref
  • DataCite
  • PubMed
  • Europe PMC
  • doi.org
  • bioRxiv
  • OpenAlex
  • Semantic Scholar
  • DBLP
  • Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Zenodo
  • Unpaywall
  • Open Library
aOne local citation check, thirteen public records.
IN YOUR BROWSER
Manuscript stays here
PARSED LOCALLY DOI 10.1038/nature14539 arXiv 1706.03762 DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 Identifiers, not manuscript text
PUBLIC LOOKUPS
13 REGISTRIES ASKED

Crossref · DataCite · PubMed · Europe PMC · doi.org · bioRxiv · OpenAlex · Semantic Scholar · DBLP · DOAJ · Zenodo · Unpaywall · Open Library

aIdentifiers cross the boundary. The manuscript does not.
YOUR BROWSER 13 PUBLIC REGISTRIES Manuscript stays here PARSED LOCALLY DOI 10.1038/nature14539 arXiv 1706.03762 DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 arXiv 1810.04805 NETWORK BOUNDARY
Figure 2. One reference is reduced to identifiers; the manuscript remains in the browser.

A reference check should show its working.

Sometimes every part of a citation looks familiar, but the parts belong to different papers. A badge cannot show you that.

StrictCite shows where each field leads and what fails to resolve. It does not change or reject the citation. You decide what belongs in the reference.

Read the method ↗

Hover or tap the underlined parts.

Eighteen rules decide when a difference is not an error.

A preprint and its conference paper can have different years. A shortened journal title can still be correct. A registry that returns nothing has not proved that the paper is imaginary.

Explore the adjudication rules ↗
aTwo years, one paper
2016 2017 2015 SAME WORK 2015 2016 arXiv CVPR
bThousands of names, one author
cA retracted paper gets flagged, with the notice attached
Wakefield 1998 Retracted 2010 cites Your paper
Figure 3. Three of the eighteen rules, on real papers.

The manuscript never crosses the network boundary.

Your browser extracts the references locally. Only identifiers and bibliographic queries go to the public registries. You then choose whether the resulting audit stays on this device or in your account.

LOCAL LIBRARY Keep the work on this device.
CLOUD ARCHIVE Carry decisions between sessions.
a
Four steps. All on this device.
  1. 01
    PDF.JSRead the document
  2. 02
    GROBID · WAPITI / WASMFind and split referencessegmentation + reference-segmenter models
  3. 03
    GROBID · CITATION MODELParse fields left blankexisting values are never overwritten
  4. 04
    PYODIDE · STRICTCITE ENGINEPlan the evidence check
bThe manuscript channel stays at zero.
Manuscript content 0 B Identifier queries time →
Figure 4. Local parsing above; measured network traffic below.
AUDIT RESULT Your choice
Local LibraryorCloud Archive

A correction should belong to the reference, not to one document.

Resolve a disagreement once and the decision stays with that work in your library. When you cite it again, the evidence comes with it. If the publication changes later, monitoring reopens the same record.

Figure 5. One record holds the evidence and the context you add to it: a note, a tag, and an abstract.

A reference is not settled forever.

Researcher Pro checks the papers you choose every Monday and lets you know only when the record changes.

Retractions · corrections · linked code · journal status · preprint updates

See Researcher Pro ↗

Every Monday we check the publication record for retractions, withdrawals, concerns, corrections, and errata.

We also follow linked GitHub and GitLab repositories, DOAJ journal status, and cited preprints that publish or update.

Up to three papers. You receive an email only when something changes.

Check references before peer review.

Reviewers should judge the research, not investigate whether its citations exist. StrictCite checks the bibliography at the editorial desk, so missing, disputed, or invented references return to the author before peer review begins.

  1. AuthorSubmits the manuscript.
  2. Editorial gateChecks the references and returns evidence-backed queries.
  3. ReviewerReceives the paper after citation questions are handled.
See the editorial workflow ↗ Editorial Desk from $49/month + tax
LATEST

From the field notes.

Cases from the scholarly record, examined in public.

View the archive ↗
  1. 1019 OCT 2026OpenAI released 722 math manuscripts. Who is supposed to verify them?Three withdrawals, fourteen revisions, and a dispute over who carries the cost of verification at this scale.
  2. 0912 OCT 2026ICLR 2027 submission checklist.Page limits, templates, AI disclosures, and the details that can trigger a desk rejection.
  3. 0804 OCT 2026ICLR desk-rejects bad references. Its own template has shipped one since 2018.The rules, the contradiction, and the bibliography error that survived nine conference cycles.
  4. 0726 SEP 2026What Pangram’s own report says about the NeurIPS position-paper screen.Twelve widely repeated claims checked against the primary sources.
PRICING PRINCIPLE

Integrity is included.

Choose a plan by how many references you check. Retraction detection and the full evidence record are included on every plan.

THE SAME EVIDENCE, EVERY TIME

Every plan checks all 13 registries, looks for retractions, and includes Repair Studio and exports.

FREE$0forever

Check as you write.

For a working bibliography that needs a reliable daily check.

Daily checking
30 references every day
Saved decisions
On this device
Matching setting
Safe default
Start free ↗
DEADLINE PASS$3.99one payment + tax

Finish a deadline.

For the final week: unlimited checking and adjustable matching.

Checking window
Unlimited for 7 days
Saved decisions
On this device
Matching setting
Adjustable
Buy a pass ↗
RESEARCHER PRO ONGOING RESEARCH$9.00per month + tax

Keep work in view.

For research you want to carry, revisit, and watch after submission.

Checking
Unlimited
Saved decisions
Every device
After submission
Up to 3 papers, checked weekly
Choose Pro ↗
For editorial teams checking manuscripts in a queueSee Editorial Desk ↗Compare every feature ↗

Your bibliography
is making claims.

Check whether the scholarly record agrees.

Audit it free ↗

“Every work stands or falls by the witnesses it names.”